The Hidden Legacy of COVID-19 Pharmaceuticals in Our Water

While the world focused on the pandemic, a silent environmental story was unfolding beneath the surface.

Imagine this: for every dose of medication that helped a COVID-19 patient, a portion of that potent compound began a journey through sewer systems into rivers and lakes, eventually returning to our taps. As the world battled the pandemic, a less visible crisis emerged—the environmental impact of SARS-CoV-2 pharmaceutical drugs accumulating in our waterways. This is the story of how scientists are fighting pollution with light, sound, and chemical reactions in a race to protect our water resources.

The Pharmaceutical Flood: More Than Just a Virus

During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, global consumption of certain pharmaceuticals skyrocketed. In Greece, use of antiviral drugs increased by 170%, hydroxychloroquine by 387%, and paracetamol by 198% 4 . In Spain, azithromycin consumption reached 400% of pre-pandemic levels 9 . These medications became essential tools in managing the pandemic, but with consequences few anticipated.

When we take medication, our bodies don't use all of it. Typically, 55-80% of active pharmaceutical ingredients are excreted unchanged in urine, with another 4-30% in feces 4 . This chemical cocktail flows from our bathrooms to wastewater treatment plants not designed to remove these synthetic compounds.

"The human body only metabolizes approximately 60–70% of the active pharmaceuticals, leaving residual metabolites and unmetabolized pharmaceuticals to be excreted," explains a comprehensive review on COVID-19 drugs in the environment 4 .

The problem is compounded by the chemical stability of these compounds. Drugs like chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine possess good solubility and chemical stability, while others like ivermectin are hydrophobic with strong affinity for soil and organic matter 4 . This persistence allows them to accumulate in the environment, where even low concentrations can disrupt aquatic ecosystems and potentially contribute to antibiotic resistance.

170%

Increase in antiviral drug use in Greece

387%

Increase in hydroxychloroquine use in Greece

400%

Azithromycin consumption in Spain vs pre-pandemic

55-80%

Active pharmaceutical ingredients excreted unchanged

Advanced Oxidation Processes: Nature's Clean-Up Crew, Amplified

Enter Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs)—sophisticated water treatment methods that employ powerful chemical reactions to break down persistent pollutants. These technologies work by generating reactive oxygen species, particularly hydroxyl radicals (OH•), among the most powerful oxidizing agents known to chemistry 1 3 .

These hydroxyl radicals attack pharmaceutical molecules through three primary mechanisms:

Hydrogen abstraction

Stealing hydrogen atoms from organic molecules

Electron transfer

Removing electrons to destabilize molecular structures

Radical addition

Adding to double bonds or aromatic rings

The result is the progressive breakdown of complex pharmaceutical molecules into simpler, less harmful compounds—ideally, carbon dioxide and water in a process called mineralization 1 .

AOP Mechanisms

Visual representation of how hydroxyl radicals break down pharmaceutical compounds through different mechanisms.

Advanced Oxidation Processes for Pharmaceutical Removal
AOP Category Examples Key Features Reported Efficiency for COVID-19 Drugs
Chemical-Based Ozone, Fenton reaction Strong oxidation potential >65% mineralization for SARS-CoV-2 pharmaceuticals 1
Radiation-Driven Photolysis, photocatalysis Utilizes UV or solar energy Photocatalysis most applied currently 1
Hybrid Methods HC/O₃/H₂O₂, O₃/UV Combined approaches for synergy >98% viral load reduction in some hybrid systems 3
Sonochemical Hydrodynamic cavitation Uses sound waves to form cavities Effective in combination with other AOPs 1 3

A Closer Look: The Experiment That Tested Ten AOPs Against SARS-CoV-2

In 2023, researchers conducted a comprehensive study comparing the effectiveness of ten different AOPs at removing SARS-CoV-2 viral load from sewage water 3 . This experiment provides valuable insights into the real-world performance of these technologies.

Methodology: Putting AOPs to the Test

The research team collected raw sewage water from the inlet of a sewage treatment plant in Pune, India. They subjected these samples to ten different AOPs, including:

  • Individual processes: Ozone (O₃), Hydrodynamic Cavitation (HC), Ultraviolet Radiation (UV)
  • Hybrid combinations: HC/O₃, HC/O₃/Hâ‚‚Oâ‚‚, HC/Hâ‚‚Oâ‚‚, O₃/UV, UV/Hâ‚‚Oâ‚‚, UV/Hâ‚‚Oâ‚‚/O₃, and O₃/Hâ‚‚Oâ‚‚

The experimental setup for hydrodynamic cavitation consisted of a 5-liter effluent holding tank, a centrifugal pump, and a venturi throat that created cavitation bubbles. For photocatalytic and ozonation processes, they used an annular glass reactor with a UV lamp (80W, 254 nm wavelength) and ozone generator 3 .

After treatment, the researchers isolated total nucleic acid from the water samples and used RT-qPCR to quantify the remaining SARS-CoV-2 viral load, comparing it to untreated sewage water.

Experimental Setup Visualization
Laboratory equipment for water treatment research

Example of laboratory equipment used in AOP research for water treatment.

Results and Analysis: Clear Winners Emerge

The experimental results revealed striking differences between the various AOPs:

Treatment Method SARS-CoV-2 Reduction Additional Benefits
Ozone-based & Hybrid AOPs >98% viral load reduction Most promising results
Ozone alone >98% viral load reduction Highly effective standalone
Other AOPs Variable efficiency Less consistent performance
Key Finding

Perhaps more importantly, the six best-performing AOPs also significantly reduced Pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV), a viral indicator of fecal contamination, while improving overall water quality by increasing dissolved oxygen and decreasing total organic carbon 3 .

This experiment demonstrated that ozone-based approaches, particularly when combined with other methods, offer the most reliable solution for eliminating SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses from wastewater. The success of ozone lies in its powerful oxidation potential and ability to penetrate microbial structures.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Solutions for AOP Research

Developing effective advanced oxidation processes requires specialized reagents and equipment. Below are key components from the researcher's toolkit:

Tool Function in AOP Research Application Example
Hydrogen Peroxide (Hâ‚‚Oâ‚‚) Hydroxyl radical precursor Used in Fenton reaction and with ozone/UV 3
Ozone Generator Produces ozone gas for oxidation Standalone treatment or in hybrid AOPs 3
UV Radiation (254 nm) Photocatalyst and direct disinfectant UV photolysis and photocatalytic AOPs 1 3
Venturi Cavitation Device Creates hydrodynamic cavitation bubbles HC-based AOPs for radical generation 3
Titanium Dioxide (TiOâ‚‚) Photocatalyst under UV or solar light Semiconductor photocatalysis 1
Scavenger Compounds Identifies contribution of specific radicals Mechanism studies (e.g., using tert-butanol for OH•) 6
Hydroxyl Radical Generation
AOP Effectiveness Comparison

Beyond COVID-19: The Future of Water Treatment

The research into AOPs for removing SARS-CoV-2 pharmaceuticals has broader implications for water treatment in a world increasingly dependent on pharmaceuticals. These technologies represent a paradigm shift from conventional water treatment, which often fails to remove persistent pharmaceutical compounds 7 .

While challenges remain—particularly in scaling up laboratory successes to cost-effective municipal applications—the progress has been remarkable. Photocatalysis has garnered significant attention because it can utilize solar energy, though low efficiencies and high costs currently limit large-scale implementation 1 .

Future research directions include developing more efficient catalysts, optimizing hybrid processes that combine the strengths of multiple AOPs, and creating intelligent systems that adapt treatment based on the specific pharmaceutical profile of the water being treated.

As one review notes, "AOPs offer different ways for hydroxyl radical production" 1 , highlighting the versatility of this approach against an ever-evolving array of environmental contaminants.
Future Research Directions
  • More efficient catalysts
  • Optimized hybrid processes
  • Intelligent adaptive systems
  • Solar energy utilization
  • Cost-effective scaling

Conclusion: A Clear Path Forward

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed the vulnerability of our water systems to pharmaceutical pollution, but it also accelerated the development of innovative solutions. Advanced oxidation processes have proven their worth as powerful tools for breaking down SARS-CoV-2 pharmaceuticals and reducing viral load in wastewater.

As we continue to navigate a world where emerging contaminants present ongoing challenges, the lessons learned from combating COVID-19 pharmaceutical pollution provide hope and direction. Through continued research and implementation of AOP technologies, we can work toward a future where our water remains clean and safe, regardless of what new compounds modern medicine develops.

The silent legacy of pandemic pharmaceuticals in our water need not be permanent—with scientific innovation, we can break these compounds down before they break down our ecosystems.

References